ISHR works to ensure that international and regional human rights mechanisms make stronger standards, resolutions and recommendations on the protection of defenders, and that States enact national laws and policies to give effect to these norms.
17 results found
Provides guidelines for European ambassadors and embassies regarding their role in identifying, supporting, and protecting human rights defenders. Important for human rights defenders to know the ways in which European embassies can assist them in their mission.
Provides a brief update on the proceedings of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon investigating the death of Rafiq Hariri as well as background on the witness.
“Human rights defender” is a term used to describe people who, individually or with others, act to promote or protect human rights. Human rights defenders are identified above all by what they do and it is through a description of their actions (section A below) and of some of the contexts in which they work (section B below) that the term can best be explained. The examples given of the activities of human rights defenders are not an exhaustive list.
ISHR’s Reprisals Handbook is aimed first and foremost at human rights defenders who interact with regional and international human rights systems.
It highlights the risks that you, as defenders, can face from interacting with international and regional human rights systems, and suggests ways in which you can leverage these systems to provide some degree of protection for yourselves and promote accountability for perpetrators of acts of intimidation or reprisal. In doing so it does not aim to provide a fully comprehensive protection solution, but rather to complement measures that you should also take at the national level.
This report details March 2013 trial of 94 intellectuals, activists and human rights defenders charged with founding, organizing and administering an organization aimed at overthrowing the government. The report concludes that: 1) the judge has failed in his duty to investigate credible allegations of torture of the defendants whilst in pre-trial detention, and 2) the trial is proceeding in violation of internationally recognized standards of a fair trial.